|
|
|
|
|
[Mccoypottery-talk] Intro and Question
bryan johnson
bryanjjohnson@yahoo.com
Wed, 14 Nov 2001 10:14:39 -0800 (PST)
actually, they're not illegal and not really phoney.
when the mccoy factory burnt down, they sold whatever
they could to whoever would buy--many molds were sold
to robinson ransbottom pottery company (rrpco) and
were used "as is".
the circle and quill jardinaires with either
brush/mccoy/nm/nmmcoy/usa/rrpco/robinson ransbottom
roseville, ohio on the bottom is a good example of a
popular mold that was used continuously for almost 50
years by two different companies.
although they can't really be classified as 'fakes',
it's best to know who made them, as prices vary
accordingly.
bryanjjohnson
(who's just about ready for his annual trek to
zanesville!)
--- McQuita@aol.com wrote:
> Pat, cookie jars were made after the Brush-McCoy era
> so they're either Brush or McCoy. If it's marked
> brush mccoy, it's a reproduction of another jar or a
> re-make of another jar possibly not even brush or
> mccoy. some rrpco jars, for example, have been
> remade and marked brush mccoy. they're phonies,
> unreal, illegal, etc. Chiquita
>
=====
--bryan
bryanjjohnson@yahoo.com
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Find the one for you at Yahoo! Personals
http://personals.yahoo.com
News | Search | Site
Index | Pottery Index | Cookie
Jars | Brush
McCoy | Lancaster
Colony |
Mark | History | Classifieds |
Guestbook | Store | Forums | Auctions | Mailing
Lists | Mission
Statement | Bibliography | Advertising | Contact | Home
GoToMyPC |
Go To Meeting |
Free Credit Report |
Cash Advance
Copyright 1995-2024 McCoyPottery.Com Online Services - Privacy Policy
All trademarks and copyrights are the property of
their respective owners.