[Mccoypottery-talk] Faye messed up...

[BarbCrews]

This is my opinion, although many disagree with me on the reproduction aspect.

"There are reasons why a collector would purchase a reproduction jar. A 
reproduction jar should be both quite a bit cheaper and easier to find than 
the real thing. In my opinion, there is nothing wrong with having a 
reproduction jar in your collection, as long as you know it is a 
reproduction jar when purchasing it. And as long as the jar is marked well 
enough that later on down the line there will be no question about it being 
a reproduction. Reproducing licensed items is another story and one that is 
definitely open to lawsuits. Stay away from unauthorized jars of licensed 
characters."

Meanwhile.... a fake is meant to deceive would-be buyers and collectors.

bc


At 07:59 AM 10/31/2002 -0500, you wrote:
>Good question.  I would say that a fake is a reproduction that is passed
>off as the real thing.  A reproduction can be legitimate as long as it
>is indicated as such.  Someone else may have a better answer.  I know I
>saw some really awful Roseville fakes at a flea market.  They were
>reproductions but not marked as such so might fool a person not very
>familiar with the real pottery.  Same with some lady head vases from the
>same dealer.
>Elizabeth
>
>Received: from smtpinvite-2001-5.public.lawson.webtv.net (172.16.213.205)
>         by storefull-2235.public.lawson.webtv.net with WTV-SMTP; Thu, 31
>         Oct 2002 04:55:26 -0800 (PST)
>Received: from home.mia.net (home.mia.net [208.146.240.204]) by
>         smtpinvite-2001-5.public.lawson.webtv.net (WebTV_Postfix+sws) with
>         ESMTP id 25E70FE0D; Thu, 31 Oct 2002 04:55:25 -0800 (PST)
>Received: from home (IDENT:mail@localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by
>         home.mia.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g9VCsX720240; Thu, 31
>         Oct 2002 06:54:33 -0600
>Received: from imo-d10.mx.aol.com (imo-d10.mx.aol.com [205.188.157.42]) by
>         home.mia.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g9VCsW720228 for 
> <mccoypottery-talk@lists.mccoypottery.com>;
>         Thu, 31 Oct 2002 06:54:32 -0600
>Received: from LeeAnnBob@aol.com by imo-d10.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v34.13.)
>         id 5.cb.2a7d087e (3866) for 
> <mccoypottery-talk@lists.mccoypottery.com>;
>         Thu, 31 Oct 2002 07:54:15 -0500 (EST)
>From: LeeAnnBob@aol.com
>Message-ID: <cb.2a7d087e.2af281f7@aol.com>
>Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 07:54:15 EST
>Subject: Re: [Mccoypottery-talk] Faye messed up...
>To: mccoypottery-talk@lists.mccoypottery.com
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
>         boundary="part1_cb.2a7d087e.2af281f7_boundary"
>X-Mailer: AOL 6.0 for Windows US sub 10578
>Sender: mccoypottery-talk-admin@lists.mccoypottery.com
>Errors-To: mccoypottery-talk-admin@lists.mccoypottery.com
>X-BeenThere: mccoypottery-talk@lists.mccoypottery.com
>X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta2
>Precedence: bulk
>Reply-To: mccoypottery-talk@lists.mccoypottery.com
>List-Id: <mccoypottery-talk.lists.mccoypottery.com>
>
>thanks for answering my question regarding LRRH. Now I have another 
>question.  What is the difference between reproduction and fake?